Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    TRENDING :
    • California Voters Reject The Billionaire Tax
    • How to Make Money on Social Media Without a Huge Following
    • 28-Year-Old’s Side Hustle Hit $125K in Year 1: More Than Matcha
    • How to Speak Honestly at Work Without Derailing Your Career
    • Silicon Valley Doesn’t Have a Monopoly on Startup Wisdom
    • The EU Will Block Peace Between Russia & Ukraine
    • Laid-Off Marketer’s Apartment-Made Pizzas Sell Out in 30 Seconds
    • 4 Questions That Separate Real Founders From Performers
    Compatriot Chronicle
    • Home
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    • Economy
    • Business
    • Headline News
    Compatriot Chronicle
    Home»Business»Duffy’s ‘DEI bike lanes’ comment politicizes urban design. The policy won’t make roads faster
    Business

    Duffy’s ‘DEI bike lanes’ comment politicizes urban design. The policy won’t make roads faster

    July 29, 20265 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The Trump administration could soon reduce public transportation choices in the U.S. and make it more difficult to get around town on your own.

    A series of recent moves by the Department of Transportation deprioritizes mass transportation and bike lanes by removing information previously available online and proposing funding cuts, describing these strategic mainstays of good urban design as “DEI” (diversity, equity, and inclusion) efforts.

    In a letter sent to lawmakers this month, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy asks Congress to authorize the Trump administration’s new transportation priorities, which he positions through a lens of partisan politics. The proposal would also scale back funding for bike lanes.

    Whether or not the rhetoric scores Duffy political points, in practical terms it could make American roadways less safe. “Secretary Duffy is asking Congress to ignore the facts about bike lanes: They improve safety, don’t cause congestion, and aren’t a partisan issue,” says Laura Jenkins, communications director for the League of American Bicyclists, a nonprofit association. Improvements like green “bike boxes” painted on the road or physical barriers have been shown to reduce collisions with motorists.

    Duffy’s proposal also includes cutting funding for public transportation and EV infrastructure. It calls for eliminating the Highway Trust Fund, which includes a Reagan-era mass transit account that funds public transportation; prioritizes motor vehicle traffic over bike lanes; and ends a requirement that projects paid for through the Complete Streets program to increase pedestrian and cyclist safety also include sidewalks and bikeways.

    In his letter, Duffy says bike lanes increase congestion and waste fuel, and he asks Congress to restrict federal grants for bike lanes and to remove bike lanes “that contribute to congestion,” though he offers no specifics on how that would be determined. It’s worth noting that recent research from cities across the globe has found that bike lanes can reduce traffic congestion.

    Duffy puts bikes in the political lane

    The Trump administration has worked to remove information about bike lanes from government web pages, including from the Federal Highway Administration website just this month. According to an internal email seen by NPR, DOT staff were told to remove pages that included language about bike safety from the site two days after a social media post from Duffy called bike lanes “DEI.”

    Duffy previewed his proposal to Senate lawmakers with a post on social media that cast transportation as a culture war. “Remember when Biden and Boot-edge-edge used YOUR MONEY for DEI bike lanes and climate change? THAT’S OVER,” he wrote.

    The “DEI” reference seems to be a dig at Biden administration projects funded by the former president’s bipartisan infrastructure legislation, which includes money for pedestrian and bike infrastructure, recreational trails, and safe routes to school in communities of color that are disproportionately impacted by roadway fatalities.

    There’s a difference in Americans’ primary modes of transportation that fall along the urban-rural divide, which today has become highly correlated with party affiliation. Democrats, who are more likely to live in cities, are thus more likely to ride bikes and take the train around town than Republicans, who are more likely to live in rural areas and need to drive everywhere. (The suburbs are more or less split evenly.)

    Rather than presenting the Trump administration’s transportation priorities as being for Americans no matter where they live, though, Duffy frames the issue as an us versus them proposition, as if riding a bike is somehow “woke.”

    Additionally, Duffy’s letter calls for more federal oversight of local public transportation systems by tying government funding to crime and safety, changing regulations related to autonomous vehicles, providing new grants for interstate funding, further privatizing air travel, mandating vehicles be capable of wireless data transmission or automated driving, requiring all knowledge and skills tests for commercial driver’s licenses be administered in English, adopting permanent daylight saving time, and providing an additional $1 billion for renovating New York’s Penn Station, which would be renamed.

    Authorization of DOT surface transportation funding ends on September 30, so between now and then, lobbyists and lawmakers will hash out a funding bill that could include some of these proposals. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Monday he would block any proposal that renames Penn Station for Trump.

    “Politics ahead of safety”

    At least when it comes to the Trump administration’s views on bike lanes, the League of American Bicyclists, which advocates for cycling infrastructure and safety, is not on board. The group says DOT “needs to explain why it is putting politics ahead of safety.”

    “DOT’s own data shows bike lanes reduce crashes up to 49% and don’t increase congestion, and polling consistently shows Americans want safer roads and more bikeable communities,” Jenkins says. “They don’t have the facts, they don’t have the law, they don’t even have the American public on this, so they’re taking cheap shots at people who bike.”

    According to government research that Duffy’s DOT has removed from its website, adding bike lanes reduces all crashes—not only bike crashes but also vehicle crashes—by 53%, as well as reduces crashes on both four- and two-lane undivided and local roads.




    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    How to Make Money on Social Media Without a Huge Following

    November 12, 2026

    28-Year-Old’s Side Hustle Hit $125K in Year 1: More Than Matcha

    November 12, 2026

    How to Speak Honestly at Work Without Derailing Your Career

    November 12, 2026
    Top News

    Lizzo turned a Chili’s rib into a flute for one of the weirdest ads of the year

    By Staff WriterMay 27, 2026

    Lizzo’s latest song has a familiar, almost too-catchy riff. “I want my baby back, baby…

    I asked chatbots to find me cheap flights over the holidays. The results were mixed

    October 11, 2025

    Home prices are falling in these 89 housing markets—see what’s behind it

    April 18, 2026

    This Trump ‘participation trophy’ perfectly mocks his second term

    July 15, 2026
    Top Trending

    California Voters Reject The Billionaire Tax

    By Staff WriterNovember 12, 2026

    California voters have rejected the proposed 5% billionaire wealth tax, and perhaps…

    How to Make Money on Social Media Without a Huge Following

    By Staff WriterNovember 12, 2026

    Key Takeaways Follower count is a vanity metric. Trust and engagement are…

    28-Year-Old’s Side Hustle Hit $125K in Year 1: More Than Matcha

    By Staff WriterNovember 12, 2026

    Key Takeaways Goldwasser leveraged her marketing and consulting experience to build More…

    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    About us

    The Populist Bulletin serves as a beacon for the populist movement, which champions the interests of ordinary citizens over the agendas of the powerful and entrenched elitists. Rooted in the belief that the voices of everyday workers, families, and communities are often drowned out by powerful people and institutions, it delivers straightforward, unfiltered, compelling, relatable stories that resonate with the values of the American public.

    The Populist Bulletin was founded with a fervent commitment to inform, inspire, empower and spark meaningful conversations about the economy, business, politics, inequality, government accountability and overreach, globalization, and the preservation of American cultural heritage.

    The site offers a dynamic mix of investigative journalism, opinion editorials, and viral content that amplify populist sentiments and deliver stories that echo the concerns of everyday Americans while boldly challenging mainstream narratives that serve the privileged few.

    Top Picks

    California Voters Reject The Billionaire Tax

    November 12, 2026

    How to Make Money on Social Media Without a Huge Following

    November 12, 2026

    28-Year-Old’s Side Hustle Hit $125K in Year 1: More Than Matcha

    November 12, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    Copyright © 2025 Populist Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.