Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    TRENDING :
    • Can India Become The Next Factory Of The World?
    • Silence in a Meeting Isn’t Alignment. It’s Fear. Here’s How to Build a Team That Tells You the Truth
    • For Two Years, I Was Using AI Wrong. Fixing It Is Why My Clients Are Winning While Other Brands Fall Behind.
    • Your Cold Outreach Keeps Getting Deleted for These 5 Reasons
    • What Separates Entrepreneurs Who Endure From Those Who Quit
    • Your Team Doesn’t Need Certainty. It Needs Direction.
    • This Restaurant Chain Went Back to the Basics to Boost Sales
    • Market Talk – July 29, 2026
    Compatriot Chronicle
    • Home
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    • Economy
    • Business
    • Headline News
    Compatriot Chronicle
    Home»Business»At the 2026 Golden Globes, politics stayed on the red carpet
    Business

    At the 2026 Golden Globes, politics stayed on the red carpet

    January 13, 20265 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    On the red carpet of the 2026 Golden Globes, several celebrities used their garments as vehicles of protest against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency and spoke openly about their dissent against the current Trump administration.

    But on the event’s actual stage, political commentary was noticeably absent compared with years past.

    Popular American awards shows have long been criticized for primarily uplifting the voices of white, male, affluent creators. But, equally, the stages of these events have been used as platforms for public figures to speak out about current politics and social justice.

    In 1973, Marlon Brando famously rejected his best actor Oscar statuette at the Academy Awards and sent Sacheen Littlefeather, a Native American woman, to deliver a speech on his behalf. More recently, in 2018, Seth Meyers made numerous jokes at Trump’s expense at the Golden Globes. 

    This year, though, political commentary on the Golden Globes stage was kept to a few passing comments and oblique references. It’s a shift that reflects a broader trend of Hollywood’s elite seemingly turning a blind eye to the current state of affairs during Trump’s second term.

    “The most important thing in the world”

    To glean any kind of political statement from last night’s show, one might have needed to perform a close reading. 

    Comedian Nikki Glasser opened the ceremony with a vague allusion to pretty much everything happening outside of Hollywood, calling the Golden Globes “without a doubt the most important thing happening in the world right now.”

    Others followed with similarly discreet jabs, including one comment from director Judd Apatow—“I believe we’re in a dictatorship now”—neatly sandwiched within a stream of jokes.

    Even when the film One Battle After Another—a satire about revolution that critiques anti-immigration groups—won multiple awards, no statement was made directly about the current administration.

    Compare that tenor to 2017, when, just months after Trump was elected for his first term, one of the Golden Globes’ most viral—and impactful—moments came when Meryl Streep used her acceptance speech to publicly call out the president.

    “Hollywood is crawling with outsiders and foreigners, and if we kick them all out, we’ll have nothing to watch except football and mixed martial arts—which are not the arts,” Streep said.

    Her speech came years before Trump’s National Guard ever brutalized protestors in the streets, before the Department of Homeland Security separated thousands of children from their parents, before ICE agents starting showing up at schools and community centers across the country, and before agent Jonathan Ross shot and killed Minneapolis resident Renee Nicole Good just last week.

    Yet, somehow, it would have looked out of place at last night’s comparatively apolitical event.

    “Of course, this is for the mother”

    To be fair, several celebrities did make an effort to speak up. Stars including Wanda Sykes, Natasha Lyonne, and Jean Smart wore pins reading “Be Good” as a reference to Renee Nicole Good. Others sported pins with the phrase “Ice Out.” 

    In a preshow interview with Variety, Sykes explained her pin: “Of course, this is for the mother who was murdered by an ICE agent, and it’s really sad.”

    Mark Ruffalo also spoke more directly, telling Entertainment Tonight: “We’ve got, literally, storm troopers running around terrorizing. And as much as I love all this, I don’t know if I can pretend like this crazy stuff isn’t happening.”

    In another interview with USA Today, Ruffalo added: “[Trump is] a pedophile. He’s the worst human being. If we’re relying on this guy’s morality for the most powerful country in the world, then we’re all in a lot of trouble.”

    But, notably, these comments were shared on the red carpet, to be consumed by readers at disparate news outlets—rather than on the main stage itself, to millions of viewers at home. When the evening’s stars got their moments in the limelight, they largely opted to stay quiet. 

    “Am I brave, or are they cowards?”

    The literal sidelining of political commentary at the 2026 Golden Globes may be disappointing to fans who want celebrities to speak out about injustices, but it’s not surprising, given Hollywood’s about-turn since Trump’s second term began.

    Celebs like Jennifer Lawrence, Robert De Niro, Barry Jenkins, and others who once strongly criticized the president have lately been quiet. Lawrence herself recently spoke on this change, stating in an interview with The New York Times’ The Interview podcast that “we’ve learned, election after election, celebrities do not make a difference whatsoever on who people vote for.”

    But as Refinery 29 aptly observes in a recent article, that’s not entirely true. Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris ahead of the 2024 presidential election drove more than 400,000 people to the vote.gov site in 24 hours, it points out. And Bridgerton actress Nicola Coughlan’s advocacy for Palestine aid organizations has helped raise more than $2 million to date.

    Speaking to Refinery 29 after this year’s Golden Globes show, actress and activist Jameela Jamil refuted the idea that her own advocacy is “brave.” 

    “Am I brave, or are they cowards?” she said. “I think they’re being greedy and weird and disappointing. Look at the billions of eyeballs on all of us collectively—there should be no outliers of the industry who are the outspoken ones . . . out there on their own with this amount of privilege.”





    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Silence in a Meeting Isn’t Alignment. It’s Fear. Here’s How to Build a Team That Tells You the Truth

    July 30, 2026

    For Two Years, I Was Using AI Wrong. Fixing It Is Why My Clients Are Winning While Other Brands Fall Behind.

    July 30, 2026

    Your Cold Outreach Keeps Getting Deleted for These 5 Reasons

    July 30, 2026
    Top News

    Costco’s beloved $5 rotisserie chickens are ruffling feathers—here’s why

    By Staff WriterJanuary 29, 2026

    The legendary $4.99 rotisserie chickens from Costco are under fire this week as a proposed…

    Spring equinox 2026: Time, meaning, and the science behind the turning of the seasons

    March 19, 2026

    An Olympic Gold Medalist Fell in Love With This Franchise

    July 14, 2026

    Elon Musk’s xAI is suing to fight an AI discrimination law—and the Trump administration is backing it

    April 28, 2026
    Top Trending

    Can India Become The Next Factory Of The World?

    By Staff WriterJuly 30, 2026

    For more than a decade, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been pursuing…

    Silence in a Meeting Isn’t Alignment. It’s Fear. Here’s How to Build a Team That Tells You the Truth

    By Staff WriterJuly 30, 2026

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Key Takeaways Most employees…

    For Two Years, I Was Using AI Wrong. Fixing It Is Why My Clients Are Winning While Other Brands Fall Behind.

    By Staff WriterJuly 30, 2026

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Key Takeaways AI does…

    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    About us

    The Populist Bulletin serves as a beacon for the populist movement, which champions the interests of ordinary citizens over the agendas of the powerful and entrenched elitists. Rooted in the belief that the voices of everyday workers, families, and communities are often drowned out by powerful people and institutions, it delivers straightforward, unfiltered, compelling, relatable stories that resonate with the values of the American public.

    The Populist Bulletin was founded with a fervent commitment to inform, inspire, empower and spark meaningful conversations about the economy, business, politics, inequality, government accountability and overreach, globalization, and the preservation of American cultural heritage.

    The site offers a dynamic mix of investigative journalism, opinion editorials, and viral content that amplify populist sentiments and deliver stories that echo the concerns of everyday Americans while boldly challenging mainstream narratives that serve the privileged few.

    Top Picks

    Can India Become The Next Factory Of The World?

    July 30, 2026

    Silence in a Meeting Isn’t Alignment. It’s Fear. Here’s How to Build a Team That Tells You the Truth

    July 30, 2026

    For Two Years, I Was Using AI Wrong. Fixing It Is Why My Clients Are Winning While Other Brands Fall Behind.

    July 30, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    Copyright © 2025 Populist Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.