Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    TRENDING :
    • An AI Assistant Hacked a Gym While Trying to Help Book a Class
    • This Startup Raised $750 Million for Batteries Powered by Rust
    • ChatGPT Is Giving Personal Finance Tips — Where It Goes Wrong
    • What’s happening with D.C.’s Kennedy Center? A pro-Trump board will soon meet to discuss these new closure plans
    • Cerebras stock tanks after earnings. Time to worry about the AI chipmaker?
    • Screen-free nostalgia hits the cereal aisle with the return of real toys
    • The world’s largest ‘biological datacenter’ could help make animal testing obsolete
    • Why you should reply to your DMs on LinkedIn
    Compatriot Chronicle
    • Home
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    • Economy
    • Business
    • Headline News
    Compatriot Chronicle
    Home»Business»Elon Musk’s Twitter deal looked like a $44 billion disaster. Now, his investors stand to make a 200% return—thanks to a brilliant (and controversial) M&A move
    Business

    Elon Musk’s Twitter deal looked like a $44 billion disaster. Now, his investors stand to make a 200% return—thanks to a brilliant (and controversial) M&A move

    June 17, 20263 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    When Elon Musk finally closed on his deal to acquire Twitter, it seemed like the tech mogul may have bitten off more than he could chew. After all, over the course of 2022, Musk had offered to take the social media giant private; tried to back out of that proposal amid financial pressures; and ultimately been forced to move forward with the purchase anyway by the Delaware Chancery Court.

    He wasn’t the only one caught up in the brouhaha, either. Of the $44 billion transaction, an estimated $10 billion came in the form of equity put up by outside investors, including both preexisting shareholders rolling over their stakes and new ones eager to get on board with Musk’s latest enterprise.

    But the consensus in the wake of the deal—that Musk overpaid for the site, which he’s since renamed X, while also dragging his friends and associates into a stinker of an acquisition—no longer seems to hold true, reports Bloomberg, which recently set out to calculate where the backers’ investments now stand.

    The upshot? Name-brand investors such as Larry Ellison, Bill Ackman (by way of his charitable foundation), and Andreessen Horowitz have by this point seen a nearly 200% return on their investment.

    Yet X is hardly the sociopolitical powerhouse it once was, with short-form video continuing to eat the internet and users alienated by Musk’s right-wing politics fleeing the platform—so how did Musk ensure his backers came out looking good anyways?

    Bloomberg chalks it up to some savvy M&A, reporting that X shareholders now own a cumulative 5% of another Musk venture—the frothy rocket startup SpaceX—which will be worth $100 billion if the firm goes public at a rumored $2 trillion valuation in its upcoming, and much-heralded, initial public offering. (Reuters pegged the expected IPO valuation at $1.75 trillion this morning [May 15], although even that amount would make it the biggest stock market debut by an American company ever.)

    SpaceX owns X and xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence company, following a merger this February that reportedly valued xAI at $125 billion and SpaceX at $1 trillion. The SpaceX IPO would let X shareholders cash out their shares and see a return on those early investments.

    “The same people own all of Elon’s companies,” explained Ross Gerber, CEO of the investment firm Gerber Kawasaki, in a statement to Bloomberg. Other shareholders in the platform have included Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal, Sean “Diddy” Combs, and Jack Dorsey.

    Last year, Musk merged X with xAI—the machine learning startup behind his chatbot Grok, which was trained on Twitter’s massive logs of user content—in a deal that Bloomberg reports valued xAI at $80 billion and X itself at just over $40 billion.

    It was a boon to investors who’d been disappointed in X’s performance following Musk’s acquisition of the platform, says Gerber: “I had marked down the position like 75%, and I got to mark it back up.”

    Still, says Gerber—who estimates that the SpaceX listing will ultimately net him a 2.5 or 3 times return on his X stake—all of Musk’s financial engineering does leave other investors holding the bag: “The fact that essentially SpaceX got heavily diluted so that Elon could make whole his Twitter and xAI investors kind of just sucks for SpaceX.”

    —Brian Contreras, Staff Writer

    This article originally appeared on Fast Company’s sister website, Inc.com. 

    Inc. is the voice of the American entrepreneur. We inspire, inform, and document the most fascinating people in business: the risk-takers, the innovators, and the ultra-driven go-getters that represent the most dynamic force in the American economy.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    An AI Assistant Hacked a Gym While Trying to Help Book a Class

    August 13, 2026

    This Startup Raised $750 Million for Batteries Powered by Rust

    August 13, 2026

    ChatGPT Is Giving Personal Finance Tips — Where It Goes Wrong

    August 13, 2026
    Top News

    Tech can radically improve government

    By Staff WriterMay 28, 2026

    National Foster Care Month is a reminder that more than 330,000 children in the U.S.…

    Run a free, private, offline AI on your computer to handle repetitive tasks

    August 1, 2026

    ‘Email apnea’: Reading work emails makes us forget to breathe

    February 26, 2026

    Canada Sees A Rise In New Military Recruits

    December 9, 2025
    Top Trending

    An AI Assistant Hacked a Gym While Trying to Help Book a Class

    By Staff WriterAugust 13, 2026

    When an Australian man who only shared his first name, “Andrew,” decided…

    This Startup Raised $750 Million for Batteries Powered by Rust

    By Staff WriterAugust 13, 2026

    In science class, you probably learned that rust forms when iron reacts…

    ChatGPT Is Giving Personal Finance Tips — Where It Goes Wrong

    By Staff WriterAugust 13, 2026

    Key Takeaways Americans are increasingly using AI chatbots for everyday financial guidance.…

    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    About us

    The Populist Bulletin serves as a beacon for the populist movement, which champions the interests of ordinary citizens over the agendas of the powerful and entrenched elitists. Rooted in the belief that the voices of everyday workers, families, and communities are often drowned out by powerful people and institutions, it delivers straightforward, unfiltered, compelling, relatable stories that resonate with the values of the American public.

    The Populist Bulletin was founded with a fervent commitment to inform, inspire, empower and spark meaningful conversations about the economy, business, politics, inequality, government accountability and overreach, globalization, and the preservation of American cultural heritage.

    The site offers a dynamic mix of investigative journalism, opinion editorials, and viral content that amplify populist sentiments and deliver stories that echo the concerns of everyday Americans while boldly challenging mainstream narratives that serve the privileged few.

    Top Picks

    An AI Assistant Hacked a Gym While Trying to Help Book a Class

    August 13, 2026

    This Startup Raised $750 Million for Batteries Powered by Rust

    August 13, 2026

    ChatGPT Is Giving Personal Finance Tips — Where It Goes Wrong

    August 13, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    Copyright © 2025 Populist Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.